How To Get in – 1) Subscribe 2) Comment saying your GT and you subbed 3) I will invite you!! READ – Please do not feel left out or feel that this is a scam. Its Not. I will rack up on as many people as I can, and on Christmas, be prepared for an invite. That it my Christmas Present to…
[phpbay]xbox 360 mod, 200, “”, “”[/phpbay]
Related posts:
i subscribed my gamertag is xXglassesXx :D
xXglassesXx
subed: MR Wisdom12
GT: TheMasterMindSF, Subd and liked video.
Gt: xNiNjA PHO jus like tht
An i subed
Subbed! gt: ejgmz5
Rain Cookeh
i subbed
subbed. xFLicK N Sc0oPx
I subbed. Gt: ECHSf00tball87
hey this is claim spin my new gt is Karma Equ add me brah i miss ya (no homo)
I Subbed my GT is byYoshi
i subbed my gt is oddman out118
i subbed gt is: iSpray 4nd Pray
i subbed xbox gt: TaZe x VisIoNz
i subbed gt RaZer X AWP
i subbed gt:X iPw7Vs
i subbed: gameyhalfling06
i subbed GT-ProFound Haze
MydirtylceCream the i in ice is a lower case L
i subbed gt:Viirus Vs
SepiaSpy02897 (gt)
hé that is so cool Zephherrr
If its possible the next week please
i subbed GT xxxQS B34STAxxx
मेगाडेथ –
Description
180 Gram Gatefold Reissue
Skeptics Apocalypse is the debut album from the US speed metal band Agent Steel. It was recorded in Los Angeles, California and mastered at Frankort Wayne Studios by Tom Coyne. The album was released by Combat Records in June 1985. Agent Steel are an American speed metal band from Los Angeles, California that was formed in 1984 by singer John Cyriis (birth name "Jean Pierre"),and drummer Chuck Profus. The band released two full length albums and one EP before disbanding in 1988. They were most notable for Cyriis’s high-pitched vocals, catchy songs, melodic riffs and fast tempos mixed in with their unusual (in heavy metal) UFOs, and differential Anthropology -as the band’s song/lyrical themes.
Track listing 1. The Calling 2. Agents of Steel 3. Taken by Force 4. Evil Eye/Evil Minds 5. Bleed for the Godz 6. Children of the Sun 7. 144,000 Gone 8. Guilty as Charged 9. Back to Reign
Video
Tags us speed metal
Rosa Brooks on the Revolt of the Retired against Rumsfeld:
…. Within days, administration loyalists were suggesting that the generals had been disloyal not merely to Rumsfeld but to American democracy itself.
The dissenting generals seemed almost surprised by the speed and savagery of the administration's counteroffensive. Maybe they had assumed that their combat records and decades of service would protect them. Or maybe they had been lulled into a false sense of security by the administration's floundering Iraq policies and assumed that Rumsfeld and his White House backers were just too distracted and incompetent to go after a few courteous, highly decorated critics. But the generals should have known that this administration can be ferociously competent when there's something really important — like President Bush's poll numbers — at stake.
On the right, the key talking point in the War Against the Generals quickly emerged: “Civilian control of the military.” It was an effective line of attack, and so clever that even many who ought to have known better were suckered. The Washington Post editorial board on Tuesday, for instance, fell for it hook, line and sinker, worrying that the retired generals were threatening “the essential democratic principle of military subordination to civilian control…. If [the generals] are successful in forcing Mr. Rumsfeld's resignation, they will set an ugly precedent.”
…. I got the joke — because, dear reader, we're already well on the way to having that kind of regime. If Rumsfeld thought he could get away with calling himself Il Generalissimo, don't you think he'd do so in a heartbeat?
In the looking-glass world the Bush administration has brought us, it's the civilians in the White House and the Pentagon who have been eager to embrace the values normally exemplified by military juntas, while many uniformed military personnel have struggled to insist on values that are supposed to characterize democratic civil society.
….Military officers must obey all lawful commands and refrain from using “contemptuous words” about their civilian leaders. But when officers take the military oath, they also pledge to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, [and] bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”
That's a hard oath, because bearing “true faith” to the Constitution requires military personnel to speak out, regardless of the cost, when they think our civilian leaders have gone beyond the pale. Both our democracy and the lives of the soldiers who fight in our name depend on it. If officers remain silent when our military policies go terribly wrong, there's little the rest of us can do to set things right again.
A 4-Star Defense Of The Republic]]>
In a major attempt to diversify, traditional video game publisher THQ is launching its Margaritaville Online social game on Facebook today.
Inspired by the Jimmy Buffett song, the game is an escapist fantasy and a major release for Agoura Hills, …
Seminal computer video game Spacewar lives again –
Rosa Brooks on the Revolt of the Retired against Rumsfeld:
…. Within days, administration loyalists were suggesting that the generals had been disloyal not merely to Rumsfeld but to American democracy itself.
The dissenting generals seemed almost surprised by the speed and savagery of the administration's counteroffensive. Maybe they had assumed that their combat records and decades of service would protect them. Or maybe they had been lulled into a false sense of security by the administration's floundering Iraq policies and assumed that Rumsfeld and his White House backers were just too distracted and incompetent to go after a few courteous, highly decorated critics. But the generals should have known that this administration can be ferociously competent when there's something really important — like President Bush's poll numbers — at stake.
On the right, the key talking point in the War Against the Generals quickly emerged: “Civilian control of the military.” It was an effective line of attack, and so clever that even many who ought to have known better were suckered. The Washington Post editorial board on Tuesday, for instance, fell for it hook, line and sinker, worrying that the retired generals were threatening “the essential democratic principle of military subordination to civilian control…. If [the generals] are successful in forcing Mr. Rumsfeld's resignation, they will set an ugly precedent.”
…. I got the joke — because, dear reader, we're already well on the way to having that kind of regime. If Rumsfeld thought he could get away with calling himself Il Generalissimo, don't you think he'd do so in a heartbeat?
In the looking-glass world the Bush administration has brought us, it's the civilians in the White House and the Pentagon who have been eager to embrace the values normally exemplified by military juntas, while many uniformed military personnel have struggled to insist on values that are supposed to characterize democratic civil society.
….Military officers must obey all lawful commands and refrain from using “contemptuous words” about their civilian leaders. But when officers take the military oath, they also pledge to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, [and] bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”
That's a hard oath, because bearing “true faith” to the Constitution requires military personnel to speak out, regardless of the cost, when they think our civilian leaders have gone beyond the pale. Both our democracy and the lives of the soldiers who fight in our name depend on it. If officers remain silent when our military policies go terribly wrong, there's little the rest of us can do to set things right again.
A 4-Star Defense Of The Republic]]>